How quickly can staff augmentation teams start delivering?

In this engagement, vetted engineers were onboarded in waves and started participating in sprint rituals within the first two weeks. The onboarding plan included architecture walkthroughs, coding standards, and domain-specific runbooks.

What roles were included in the IT Systems Innova team?

The team included Java developers, .NET developers, a mobile specialist, a front-end developer, and a UX/UI designer, matched to the client roadmap and existing team structure.

How did Siblings Software reduce cross-border delivery risk?

We introduced role-specific onboarding playbooks, overlapping standups, and shared Definition of Done checkpoints so distributed teams in different countries could align on quality and release cadence.

IT Systems Innova Staff Augmentation Case Study

IT Systems Innova, a Uruguay-based software company, needed to scale delivery for active projects in Latin America and the United States. Local hiring pipelines could not keep pace with demand, and leadership wanted to expand capacity without sacrificing quality, sprint rhythm, or domain continuity.

Siblings Software partnered with their engineering managers to design a role-by-role staffing plan, then executed a structured selection and onboarding model focused on delivery readiness. The outcome was a cross-functional team that integrated quickly and kept roadmap commitments on track.

For teams evaluating alternatives, this is a practical example of how staff augmentation services can add senior Java, .NET, mobile, and design capacity while preserving in-house ownership of architecture and product direction.

Download case (PDF)

Challenge, context, and constraints

IT Systems Innova had a healthy pipeline but faced a common scaling bottleneck: high demand for experienced software engineers in a limited local talent market. At the same time, project obligations required predictable releases, communication overlap with client teams, and fast onboarding for new contributors.

Delivery pressure

Multiple initiatives in parallel created demand for backend and integration specialists, while existing engineers still had to maintain velocity on in-flight sprint goals.

Cross-border collaboration

Teams needed contributors who could work effectively across time zones, align with agile rituals, and communicate clearly with technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Quality governance

Leadership needed to protect architecture consistency and Definition of Done standards while onboarding new engineers at speed.

Our approach

We treated this engagement as an engineering enablement initiative, not only a hiring exercise. Selection, onboarding, and delivery governance were designed as one system.

1) Team design aligned to roadmap priorities

We collaborated with IT Systems Innova to map upcoming milestones and define role requirements per workstream. The final structure included 3 Java developers, 2 .NET developers, 1 mobile developer, 1 front-end developer, and 1 UX/UI designer.

2) Multi-layer screening model

Each candidate passed technical interviews, communication assessment, and scenario-based problem solving. We prioritized engineers who could contribute quickly inside distributed agile squads.

3) Structured onboarding in waves

New team members completed role-specific onboarding packs, architecture walkthroughs, coding standards review, and shared ceremonies during their first two weeks.

4) Delivery calibration and feedback loops

We monitored fit and performance through sprint-level checkpoints, enabling rapid adjustments without disrupting roadmap commitments.

Related capabilities: Java staff augmentation, .NET staff augmentation, and agile delivery teams.

Delivery examples from the engagement

Java API stream

Two engineers accelerated backend feature throughput by taking ownership of integration-heavy sprint items and reducing spillover into following iterations.

.NET modernization stream

A dedicated pair supported refactoring and release hardening activities while internal teams focused on high-priority client-facing enhancements.

UX and front-end alignment

UX/UI and front-end contributors helped standardize interaction patterns, reducing rework across handoffs between design and engineering.

Outcomes and impact

8 engineers allocated across Java, .NET, mobile, front-end, and UX disciplines.
6 engineers retained long-term in the client team with strong performance evaluations.
Cross-border onboarding time reduced by approximately 50% through standardized onboarding assets and overlapping standups.
Improved delivery predictability across distributed teams by aligning on shared sprint rituals and quality checkpoints.

Need similar support? Explore our full library of software case studies and compare delivery models for your context.

Industry references and learning resources

For teams validating delivery practices, these resources can help benchmark agile execution, engineering standards, and developer workflows in distributed environments:

The Scrum Guide (official) for shared agile terminology and team ceremonies.
Microsoft .NET documentation for modern .NET architecture and delivery patterns.
Oracle Java documentation for Java platform best practices and release guidance.